Direct Article Link or click on the image below.
Air pollution is a growing problem in most cities (big and small). The "Daily Dose" aims to disseminate the best available information on air pollution and engage in discussions to better understand the process of air quality management. For more details visit https://www.urbanemissions.info
Direct Article Link or click on the image below.
| From the BBC, July 31st, 2011. "Officials have long blamed factories in China for the city's dirty air, particularly in autumn and winter when prevailing winds blow from the north. But environmentalists say much of the problem lies closer to home. Arthur Lau, a researcher at the Hong Kong's University of Science and Technology, says the city is the main source of its own pollution around half the time, with roadside pollution the main culprit. Hong Kong has many green areas, with 40% of land reserved for nature conservation and recreation. But this means most of the city's seven million residents live and work in less than 25% of the land that is developed, leading to one of the highest traffic densities in the world - 275 vehicles per kilometre. Roadside pollution is also magnified by a street canyon effect created by the wall-like, high rise buildings that line many of the city's roads. Yet the city has no congestion charge or road pricing scheme such as those found in London or Singapore." Read the full article. |
Now, the group is roping modern art into its cause. Click here to see some more videos on air pollution in Hong Kong.
Also see
The city’s air quality, however, is badly lagging, with some estimates putting pollution at three times the level in New York. With some blowing in from mainland China and some generated by the woefully out-of-date engines powering many Hong Kong trucks and buses, smog regularly exceeds levels recommended by the World Health Organization.
A survey of more than 200 international and local companies operating in Hong Kong, released on Tuesday by the office-space provider Regus, suggests that the problem is negatively affecting businesses. Three of four companies said that the city’s air quality was making it harder for them to attract and retain employees from abroad.
‘‘Hong Kong’s position as the premier destination in Asia for top expatriate managers is under threat due to poor air quality,’’ Regus said.
Respondents ranked Hong Kong above Bangkok, Shanghai and Beijing in terms of air quality, which is not surprising, given the choking pollution in those cities. But Singapore was deemed far better. That should give policymakers pause, given that Singapore is Hong Kong’s chief rival for the Asian finance crown.
To be sure, we’re not talking about a mass exodus of workers as a result of air pollution. The Hong Kong economy is buzzing, business confidence is high and consumers are spending. In fact, high rents and property prices, rising wages and a shortage of suitable staff members in some sectors are among the things that companies here complain about most.
Still, the air quality issue is gaining ever more prominence. As I have noted here before, doctors and scientists have warned repeatedly that the city’s pollution are a threat to public health, associated with hundreds of deaths a year.
Pollution levels in Central, the main business district, have topped 100 points on an official air pollution index on 81 out of 150 days so far this year, according to the Clean Air Network, a campaign group.
Levels above 100 are classified by the Hong Kong environment department as ‘‘very high.’’ On Wednesday, despite generally blue skies, the index in Central stood at 102.
The Regus survey is not alone in highlighting the issue. The United States Chamber of Commerce has reported that American companies have difficulties persuading staff to come to or remain in Hong Kong.
More than half of the people questioned by AmCham in 2008 said they personally knew of professionals who had declined to come to Hong Kong because of the environmental issue.
And last year I received an e-mail from a reader who said he had shifted his investment-risk consulting business to Singapore some years ago because of the air quality issue.
‘‘It is true that all five of these Asian cities are still attractive business destinations with increasing level of economic growth, despite their varying track records when it comes to the environment,’’ said Hans Leitjen, regional vice president for East Asia at Regus.
‘‘However, to ensure continued long-term prospects for their cities, the relevant authorities would be wise to prioritize their environment in order to shore up their competitive advantage,” he said, “and in particular to face up to the challenges of poor air quality. The time to act is now.’’
Enlisting the support of 40 artists and the auction house Sotheby’s, the Clean Air Network has organized an auction of 51 environment-inspired works of modern art in what it says is the first awareness and fund-raising event of its kind.
Most of the pieces went on display Monday in the upscale International Finance Center shopping mall in Hong Kong’s financial district, where they will remain until March 27. They will go under the Sotheby’s hammer April 4, where they will form part of the auction house’s twice-yearly sale of contemporary Asian art .
Many of the artists, who include well-known names from Hong Kong and elsewhere, created works especially for the event, donating them to the Clean Air Network’s fight against pollution.
BSI Investment Advisors, which is part of the Italian insurance giant Generali, donated two more works by the photographer and video artist Jiang Zhi, each estimated by Sotheby’s to be worth as much as 70,000 Hong Kong dollars, or nearly $9,000.
The artworks include sculptures, paintings and photographs. But all illustrate environmental issues and problems, like smog, waste, climate change and the destruction of natural habitats.
Perhaps the most striking work is a pair of gray lungs standing 83 centimeters, or 32 inches, tall, crafted by the Chinese artist Ma Han. Made of fiberglass, rice and car paint, illuminated and covered with tiny human figures, the piece could fetch as much as 150,000 dollars, Sotheby’s estimates.
If Sotheby’s estimates are realized, the 51 works could raise more than 1.9 million dollars in total.
All this, and the fact that Sotheby’s is offering its auction expertise free, highlights the serious support that the campaign for clean air is getting from increasingly high-profile names in the city.
The Clean Air Network has tried imaginative approaches to campaigning before, including a spoof infomercial featuring the heartthrob Hong Kong actor Daniel Wu selling canisters of “fresh air,” which became an instant hit among YouTube users in Hong Kong.
Now, the group is roping modern art into its cause.
“The auction is not just an elite exercise for opinion leaders but a new way to approach the general public,” said Joanne Ooi, chief executive of the Clean Air Network. “Art is undoubtedly less daunting and more appealing than activism. On top of that, such a public show of support by well-known corporate partners Sotheby’s and BSI will definitely mainstream the clean air issue.”
Kevin Ching, chief executive of Sotheby’s Asia, said the auction house had decided to support the event because of the deteriorating air quality Hong Kong has seen over the past few decades.
Pollution levels in some mainland Chinese cities, including Beijing and Shanghai, are thought to be even worse than in this city of seven million. But the air in Hong Kong is bad enough now to persuade some people to leave for cleaner places and to risk hurting Hong Kong’s reputation as one of Asia’s most advanced cities.
The American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong has cautioned for years that the poor air quality is making it hard to persuade some expatriates, especially those with children, to move to or stay in Hong Kong.
A series of surveys by recruitment and relocation advisers has backed up this point.
Last July, Hong Kong’s medical profession added its voice with an urgent appeal to the government to do more about the poor air quality.
The “Clean Air Auction” display at the International Finance Center mall comes exactly a year after pollution levels in Hong Kong went off the scale, streaking past the upper end of a 500-point government air pollution index.
A sandstorm sweeping in from mainland China was largely responsible for the heavy pollution last spring, and smog blowing in from the industrial zone in the nearby Pearl River Delta is blamed for much of Hong Kong’s pollution.
But campaigners, scientists and many ordinary residents argue that the authorities could — and should — do more to contain air pollution generated within Hong Kong itself.
On Monday afternoon, roadside measuring stations in the central financial district showed a reading of 64. That may seem low compared with the 500-plus levels last March — but even 64 is defined as “high” by the city’s environment department.
Outdated trucks and buses generate as much as 90 percent of roadside pollution and help make Hong Kong’s air three times as bad as that of New York and twice as bad as that of London, the Clean Air Network contends. And a recent study by the University of Hong Kong linked the city’s poor air quality to hundreds of deaths a year.
William Furniss, a photographer from London who has lived in Hong Kong since 1993, said Monday that there were only a few days in the year now when the air in Hong Kong is clear enough for professional photography.
His flame-and-skyline image, created especially for the auction, could raise 25,000 dollars, according to Sotheby’s estimates.
“We have to make people much more aware of this problem,” said Lam Tung Pang, a Hong Kong artist whose paint-and-fabric image of a sad-looking polar bear was estimated to fetch as much as 75,000 dollars at the auction.
The report lists Dhaka in Bangladesh as the most vulnerable to climate change impacts. It is a large but relatively poor city and is located just metres above current sea levels. It is regularly impacted by tropical cyclones and flooding and has very limited adaptive capacity.
Jakarta and Manila are also extremely vulnerable cities and tie for second rank, largely because of their size, degree of exposure (both experience frequent flooding), and relatively low adaptive capacity. Kolkata and Phnom Penh tie for third most vulnerable city, largely because Kolkata is prone to saltwater intrusion and the effects of sea level rise, while Phnom Penh has very low adaptive capacity.
Each city is given a score card that lists particular vulnerabilities: to environmental exposure (storm threat, sea level rise, flooding/drought), socio-economic sensitivity (population, assets threatened) and inverse adaptive capacity, that is, its inability to adapt.