Beijing recently announced that they will consider Congestion Pricing in 2017.
Here is an article from China Dialogue in 2008, which discussed in detailed, if this is beneficial for the Beijing and is Beijing ready for this. To that matter, besides Singapore, how many cities are ready to introduce congestion pricing like London or Stockholm?
***********
Olympic transport measures in Beijing were a great success, but the
British capital may still have some important lessons to teach the
Chinese capital about managing traffic, writes London Assembly member Murad Qureshi.
Visiting Beijing for the very successful Olympic Games in August, and then attending the Urban Transportation Management Forum organized by the Shenzhen Municipal Government
to talk to their planning bureau about the experience of congestion
charging in London, gave me an interesting idea. During my visit to the
east coast cities in China, I was struck by the possibility of
introducing London-style congestion charging
to Beijing. Such measures increasingly need to be considered due to the
need to reduce congestion and improve air quality in Beijing,
particularly after the successful short-term measures undertaken during the Olympics have come to an end.
The clear blue skies at the end of the Beijing Olympics were impressive,
especially given concerns expressed by some about the possible adverse
effects of air pollution on the performance of top athletes. The
latter, of course, did not materialise, as 43 world records and 120
Olympic records were shattered during the Games. Credit here should go
to the initiatives taken by the city authorities to improve air quality
in Beijing during the Olympics, which were achieved by providing better
and cheaper public transport and implementing the car licensing scheme.
The success of the latter has interestingly led to local people to call
for the extension of the two-month, odd-even license plate restriction
that allows the city’s 3.3 million private car owners to drive only on
alternate days. In the case of public transport, Zhou Zhengyu, deputy
director of the Beijing municipal committee during the Olympics,
announced that the reduced ticket prices in use for the duration of the
Games would be extended. In Beijing there was a cut in the standard
price of a bus ticket by 60% for regular passengers and 80% for
students. Last October, the price of a single journey subway ticket was
slashed 30% to 2 yuan (US$ 0.29). So, not surprisingly, because of the
cheaper fares and the traffic control measures introduced for the
Olympics, the proportion of Beijing residents now using public transport
on a daily basis is up to 45% from 35%.
The national government initiatives enacted at the beginning of
September to raise taxes on big cars and reduce them on smaller ones
will also contribute to improving the quality of life in Beijing. Owners
of cars with engines above four-litres capacity will have to pay a 40%
tax, which is double the existing rate. The tax for cars between three
and four litres will rise from 15% to 25%. However, those cars with
below one-litre capacity will be reduced from 3% to 1%. This tax move
is a good first step for the country towards an energy-efficient and
environmentally friendly economy, while helping to save fuel and thus
increase energy security.
Yet Beijing will still have 3.3 million cars, and that figure is growing
by 300,000 a year. The only solution to this challenge is the
continuous development of the city’s public transport system along its
current path, but with one addition – congestion charging that will
ration road space by price, so that the marginal cost of an additional
trip by a car owner will be paramount in their minds.
The geography of Beijing,
with its various ring roads, would lend itself very easily to
congestion charging. At the beginning, a congestion charge zone could be
introduced within either the second or third ring road and then be
extended outwards depending on the success of the scheme and public
demand for it. In order to win public support, the funds raised from the
congestion charge would have to be reinvested into public transport. As
in London, some exemptions, or at least a discount rate, might have to
be granted to residents within the charge zone. Nevertheless, the scheme
could be put into operation very quickly using simple technology like
closed-circuit television at the entry points off the ring roads and
camera enforcement using a database of car licenses. Although I
understand there is not as yet a national database of car licenses in
China, and I am unsure as to numbers of cars that move between the
various cities of China, these hurdles should not be insurmountable for
the Chinese authorities to overcome.
One day I look forward to visiting Beijing again and seeing road
congestion charging, or least another variant of road pricing, being
implemented to improve the quality of life for Beijing's residents. This
should be the icing on the cake, heaped on top of the outstanding
investment already undertaken by the authorities, measures that are
aimed toward people-centred and scientific methods of development.
Murad Qureshi is deputy Chair of the London Assembly’s Environmental Committee. This article was originally published at The Qureshi Report.
No comments:
Post a Comment