For example, during the 2008 Olympics, the city of Beijing, did not achieve the reductions in the air pollution levels by halving the on road vehicular fleet alone. This was achieved only in conjunction with closing down a number of small and large industrial sites in and around the city.
Now, the long range transport plays a critical role. The transport emissions are ground based and tend to increase the local concentrations significantly. However, the industrial sources also contribute to farther distances. For pollutants like SO2, the transport quotient is higher than the coarse PM and this was also evident in Beijing during the games.
On one side, the visibility of the growing transport sector creates an atmospheric cloud that multiples its contribution, while the industries contribute significantly in packets of puff and contribute to farther distances.
Since the people spend more time on the roads, because of traveling or due to sitting in a congestion zone, people tend to experience the most of the air pollution along the roads and thus conclude that the contribution of transport as the main culprit. However, quantifying the contribution of the transport sector is a challenge, not only for the researchers (studying the satellite evidence earlier), but also the policy makers to propose effective measures encompassing multiple sectors.
Previous posts on transport emissions, air pollution, and health
- Emissions and co-benefits of urban transport in India
- Reports on particulate pollution source apportionment in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
- Population and pollution in urban Africa, Asia, and Latin America
- Cost of No-action on air pollution management
- 2 Wheels and 2 Legs are greener in a city
- Estimating road dust resuspension for air pollution modeling
- Mortality due to air pollution
- Average vehicular emission factors for emissions inventory development
- New BRT guide for decision makers and applications in India
- The Tata Nano Car is...
- You want me to Walk?
No comments:
Post a Comment